Author Topic: ITM's Move Into Logansport  (Read 10325 times)

CSX_CO

  • Tycoon
  • ******
  • Posts: 7786
  • Ok...lets get our stories straight......
Re: ITM's Move Into Logansport
« Reply #180 on: January 12, 2019, 06:43:19 PM »
With Ed Ellis ventures supposedly belly up, wonder how long until his equipment will be sold off?  Will there even be a trainset to rent?

central1751

  • Dispatcher
  • *****
  • Posts: 364
  • 6.6 miles from destiny. April 30th 1900
Re: ITM's Move Into Logansport
« Reply #181 on: January 12, 2019, 10:30:58 PM »
Even though its "static" for now. I personally say anything is on the table if the city can make $$$$ from it.  The rented trains itm ran were quite popular. Many other festivals in downtown that a train ride or dinner train could make money.

CSX_CO

  • Tycoon
  • ******
  • Posts: 7786
  • Ok...lets get our stories straight......
Re: ITM's Move Into Logansport
« Reply #182 on: January 13, 2019, 12:59:05 AM »
Even though its "static" for now. I personally say anything is on the table if the city can make $$$$ from it.  The rented trains itm ran were quite popular. Many other festivals in downtown that a train ride or dinner train could make money.

So, you’re conceivably going to have Kokomo, competing with ITM, and competing with the NKP Express.  All within ~30 miles away from each other?  Seems like an over saturation of the market.

scraphauler

  • Tycoon
  • ******
  • Posts: 5012
  • Oberfeldwebel Hans Scraphauler
Re: ITM's Move Into Logansport
« Reply #183 on: January 13, 2019, 12:37:16 PM »
Something to keep in mind - right now with G&W and previously with USRP, the WSRY is a COMMON CARRIER who's stock is owned by Kokomo Grain.  They contract out portions of their operation to G&W and previously USRP.  It's their railroad, G&W (and previously USRP) have to do what they tell them to do.  THAT IS CHANGING.  Remember the STB filing (current not available due to Gov shutdown).  It was for the TP&W to assume common carrier obligations.  WSRY ceases to exists as a common carrier - track from Van to Binghurst and 18TH Street to Kokomo would be TP&W no different that the rest of the TPW in Logansport.

Unless Kokomo Grain specifically spells out in the lease that G&W MUST deal with ITM or the City of Kokomo, there is NO WAY the can demand or required TPW cooperation.  I have no first hand knowledge of the agreement between KG and GW - I can you tell that based on information from another carrier that was looking at the WSRY, there was no provisions to requite dealing with excursion operators.

Landload/common carrier relations have very specific and strict roles and repsonsibiliuties.   Look at it this way, Kokomo Grain leasing their property to the TP&W is no differenct that the City of Cincinnati leasing their property to NS.   As you may be aware, the NS main line from Cincinnati to Chattanooga belongs to the Cincinnati Southern Railway.   Cincinnati Southern is not a common carrier - they lease their property to Norfolk Sothern who holds all common carrier responsibility, etc.   The City of Cincinnati as ower of Cincinnati Southern can not require, demand, or otherwise influence Norfolk Southern to do anything outside the scope of their lease agreeement.  Therefore, the City can not tell NS you WILL deal with the Bluegrass Railroad Museum and let them run an excursion train between Lexington and Cincinnati. 

In short, ITM better be able to play nice with G&W.  There are a lot of G&W lines that host tourist operations, dinner trains, excursions, etc., so obviously they are not opposed to it.  But, where they do operate, the operators are first class well run organizations that can live up to the standards G&W requires, and don't have a rocky litigious background.  If ITM can step up their game and play nice with TPW, there's a very good chance for Logansport to become a nice excursion hub. 

Wema

  • Dispatcher
  • *****
  • Posts: 417
  • A Rail History Nut
Re: ITM's Move Into Logansport
« Reply #184 on: February 13, 2019, 09:22:12 PM »

Lt._Dave

  • Dispatcher
  • *****
  • Posts: 420
Re: ITM's Move Into Logansport
« Reply #185 on: February 19, 2019, 11:01:04 AM »
Good Morning All,

Yesterday I was in Noblesville and decided to drop by the park to see the old ITM site.  I was amazed at how much equipment was still there.  First picture is just an overview from one direction.  In the boxcar picture it can't be seen very well but there appears to be boxes of materials open to the weather.  Does anyone know if that is what this is?  Also it appeared there is security on site and a large box truck was there possibly loading something.

Dave

Lt._Dave

  • Dispatcher
  • *****
  • Posts: 420
Re: ITM's Move Into Logansport
« Reply #186 on: February 19, 2019, 11:01:37 AM »
Second picture, could not get it on the first message for some reason.

danielm75

  • Fireman
  • **
  • Posts: 68
Re: ITM's Move Into Logansport
« Reply #187 on: February 19, 2019, 02:17:08 PM »
Wasn't all of ITM's collection supposed to have been out of Forest Park by sometime last year?

Trainman19

  • Superintendent
  • *****
  • Posts: 850
Re: ITM's Move Into Logansport
« Reply #188 on: February 19, 2019, 03:49:11 PM »
Wasn't all of ITM's collection supposed to have been out of Forest Park by sometime last year?

It is... well, what isn't being held captive, waiting for Noblesville to let the third parties responsible for removing them get them out.
20 down. Time taken to complete: 4 3/4 years.

central1751

  • Dispatcher
  • *****
  • Posts: 364
  • 6.6 miles from destiny. April 30th 1900
Re: ITM's Move Into Logansport
« Reply #189 on: Yesterday at 11:31:35 AM »
Supposably whats left inside the fence is no longer owned by ITM.  My biggest worries are the diesels with 426 and the F units at the top of the list. Espically with US rail out of the picture as I believe they were joint owner listed(Of the diesels along with MTO, whoever/whatever that entitiy is) on the PDF file that was posted online about who got what.  I suspect nothing will move now till we get thru the spring thaw and the ground firms back up. Lots of work to do and a line to pay for up in Logansport before they can even think about moving the Budd coaches up from the storage location in southern Indiana.  I still have my own personal doubts of this group being succesful in rebooting themselves.  But I pray for the best for them.  Just so many unknowns and nobody is really talking about how the group will move forward in Logansport.  A formal plan announced at a press conference, starting of fund raising and crowd funding ect.  Now would be the time to get the ball rolling to move past the last few years "dumpster fire" they have endured.  Time to move past that and work for the future, openly to the public.

JasonA

  • Fireman
  • **
  • Posts: 72
Re: ITM's Move Into Logansport
« Reply #190 on: Yesterday at 06:23:57 PM »
I have heard that none of the water was drained from the locos in Noblesville and there is freeze damage.  Not sure of the extent, but it did happen.

DRLOCO

  • Dispatcher
  • *****
  • Posts: 413
  • That's Real Nice!
Re: ITM's Move Into Logansport
« Reply #191 on: Yesterday at 07:42:32 PM »
Regarding the "storage" boxcars, there were stacks and stacks of information, blueprints, timetables, newspapers and magazines in there.  I was told that when Conrail vacated Union Station, the files and paperwork went into these cars...that's all ruined now.
When I was there during the "evacuation" there was so much stuff in that car (and it looked like it had been ransacked) you couldn't get in without climbing all over boxes  of paper--blueprints, a lot of magazines, timetables from around the world both public and employee ( i saw one from the 1970's queensland, australia ). It was so sad I had to just get out of there, knowing that all that stuff was going to be ruined by the elements and neglect.
Professional Locomotive Engineer and train nerd with most social skills.