Author Topic: "Skin in the game" for Hoosier State?  (Read 5151 times)

ScottFlood

  • Chief Dispatcher
  • *****
  • Posts: 531
"Skin in the game" for Hoosier State?
« on: September 20, 2013, 10:55:37 AM »
This morning's Inside Indiana Business report includes a story on cities indicating a willingness to put up money to keep the Hoosier State rolling.

http://www.insideindianabusiness.com/newsitem.asp?ID=61456

rrnut282

  • Mogul
  • *****
  • Posts: 2105
  • I'm a Hoosier Railfan!
Re: "Skin in the game" for Hoosier State?
« Reply #1 on: September 20, 2013, 11:11:48 AM »
That's the community involvement that really gets INDOT's attention when they are deciding whether to fund a project or not.  Rallies and letter campaigns are nice, but $$ speaks much louder.
rrnut2-8-2
(Mike)

CSX_CO

  • Tycoon
  • ******
  • Posts: 8236
  • Ok...lets get our stories straight......
Re: "Skin in the game" for Hoosier State?
« Reply #2 on: September 20, 2013, 04:22:48 PM »
That's the community involvement that really gets INDOT's attention when they are deciding whether to fund a project or not.  Rallies and letter campaigns are nice, but $$ speaks much louder.

Its just funny that AMTRAK uses this train to ferry their equipment between Beech Grove and Chicago, but that only comes up in passing.  I understand they don't want to delay the Cardinal with the 'shop' cars.  However, there is no reason they can't run a train to do that without passengers on it.  They did it in the 90's when the train was axed before.  W911 if I remember the symbol correctly from photos I've seen. 

AMTRAK is 'threatening' to cut the Grove off, and the good paying jobs, because they won't have the State paying to move the cars their for them.  They're acting like a kid threatening to take their football home because they can't get their way.  Such BS on AMTRAK's part in so far as that goes.  Again, they just want the State to foot a bill they'd probably have anyway if they were a 'regular' business.

Practice Safe CSX

indyspy

  • Tycoon
  • ******
  • Posts: 9983
  • Resident ATCS guru.
Re: "Skin in the game" for Hoosier State?
« Reply #3 on: September 20, 2013, 04:40:35 PM »
W911/W918 used to be the Fernald dirty dirt trains.

I imagine the movements were given the rotating P9XX symbols.

These symbols are handed out in sequential order to excursions, office car trains, circus trains, and Amtrak extras/hospital trains.

Basically any extra passenger movement. When they get to P999 they go back to P900 for the next one. So you could have heard a P911 one day.
If in doubt, Notch it out!

CIOR

  • The Second
  • Administrator
  • Jay Gould
  • *****
  • Posts: 14376
Re: "Skin in the game" for Hoosier State?
« Reply #4 on: September 20, 2013, 04:52:37 PM »
My question is, what did Amtrak do when Indy had no service?  I mean honestly they ran the hospital trains how they had to when they had to. 
They seem content to run the Amtrak less than daily and its only a service others provide to fill in the gaps. 

But hey there is more to this story then we all know.

indyspy

  • Tycoon
  • ******
  • Posts: 9983
  • Resident ATCS guru.
Re: "Skin in the game" for Hoosier State?
« Reply #5 on: September 20, 2013, 04:54:07 PM »
My question is, what did Amtrak do when Indy had no service?  I mean honestly they ran the hospital trains how they had to when they had to. 
They seem content to run the Amtrak less than daily and its only a service others provide to fill in the gaps. 

But hey there is more to this story then we all know.

Shuttle trains with no revenue cars as needed.
If in doubt, Notch it out!

arobb00

  • Superintendent
  • *****
  • Posts: 922
Re: "Skin in the game" for Hoosier State?
« Reply #6 on: September 20, 2013, 05:21:57 PM »
And isn't one of the reasons they kept Beech Grove is that it has the ability to perform heavy maintenance that no other AMTRAK facility can?  Seems to upgrade another facility (or even to contract the maintenance out) would cost them MORE than keeping the Grove open.  Plus Beech Grove has plenty of secure storage where they can keep equipment in storage without worrying about vandals and graffiti. 

CSX_CO

  • Tycoon
  • ******
  • Posts: 8236
  • Ok...lets get our stories straight......
Re: "Skin in the game" for Hoosier State?
« Reply #7 on: September 20, 2013, 05:40:55 PM »
Shuttle trains with no revenue cars as needed.

W means equipment/special moves.  P is used for true passenger trains/specials/circus trains/etc.  I'd have to ask, but I seem to remember someone telling me they used W911, which was ironic because it was a "hospital" train.

Not sure when the dirt from Ferdinan started moving, but symbols do get reused over the years.  In the case of W, they'll just activate a specific profile for whatever move they have.

Practice Safe CSX

IndyHog

  • President
  • *****
  • Posts: 1312
Re: "Skin in the game" for Hoosier State?
« Reply #8 on: September 20, 2013, 07:30:28 PM »
My question is, what did Amtrak do when Indy had no service?  I mean honestly they ran the hospital trains how they had to when they had to. 
They seem content to run the Amtrak less than daily and its only a service others provide to fill in the gaps. 

Amtrak took over Beech Grove in Apr 1975. The Hoosier State came on in 1980 sometime. Between those two dates Conrail ran hospital trains between Beech Grove and Chicago for Amtrak. I caught one as a brakeman in the late 70's sometime. Have to dig out my time books to come up with the symbol.
   The train we operated out of Beech Grove was passenger equipment only. We took it over the P&E to Danville Il and handed it over to another crew who took it to Chicago via the Egyptian Line.
« Last Edit: September 20, 2013, 08:02:26 PM by IndyHog »
Meet the new boss, he's the same as the old boss......wait a minute, He's much worse

CIOR

  • The Second
  • Administrator
  • Jay Gould
  • *****
  • Posts: 14376
Re: "Skin in the game" for Hoosier State?
« Reply #9 on: September 20, 2013, 08:41:53 PM »
Amtrak took over Beech Grove in Apr 1975. The Hoosier State came on in 1980 sometime. Between those two dates Conrail ran hospital trains between Beech Grove and Chicago for Amtrak. I caught one as a brakeman in the late 70's sometime. Have to dig out my time books to come up with the symbol.
   The train we operated out of Beech Grove was passenger equipment only. We took it over the P&E to Danville Il and handed it over to another crew who took it to Chicago via the Egyptian Line.

Thanks for the info..  Interesting move.

doublestacks

  • Mogul
  • *****
  • Posts: 2126
Re: "Skin in the game" for Hoosier State?
« Reply #10 on: September 20, 2013, 08:47:25 PM »
Its good to see someone else is willing to step up to help amtrak and show how things are done here in Indiana. Since we're on the subject, I thaught i wasnt dreaming about seeing 3 or 4 trains a day on the I&F in the early 90's. Do these hospital trains look any different than regular passenger trains? What was the difference in 20 years time that there no longer a demand to go to chicago anymore?
Steel is real and it feels no pain.

CSX_CO

  • Tycoon
  • ******
  • Posts: 8236
  • Ok...lets get our stories straight......
Re: "Skin in the game" for Hoosier State?
« Reply #11 on: September 20, 2013, 08:49:11 PM »
Its good to see someone else is willing to step up to help amtrak and show how things are done here in Indiana. Since we're on the subject, I thaught i wasnt dreaming about seeing 3 or 4 trains a day on the I&F in the early 90's. Do these hospital trains look any different than regular passenger trains? What was the difference in 20 years time that there no longer a demand to go to chicago anymore?

It isn't that there isn't demand, its just that the State of Indiana doesn't want to have to subsidize the train.  I doubt anyone would take the train if they had to pay the 'true cost' of operating it through ticket fares.

Not saying anyone could afford to fly either, if you paid the true costs.

Practice Safe CSX

doublestacks

  • Mogul
  • *****
  • Posts: 2126
Re: "Skin in the game" for Hoosier State?
« Reply #12 on: September 20, 2013, 08:55:13 PM »
It isn't that there isn't demand, its just that the State of Indiana doesn't want to have to subsidize the train.  I doubt anyone would take the train if they had to pay the 'true cost' of operating it through ticket fares.

Not saying anyone could afford to fly either, if you paid the true costs.

Practice Safe CSX

That makes sense. I draw that assumption because any amtrak train i've ever seen really didnt have too many passengers on it. Looked rather empty. Unless i just happen to catch it on its slow days, hell one night it came into town with 1 car on it.
Steel is real and it feels no pain.

E-Unit

  • President
  • *****
  • Posts: 1680
Re: "Skin in the game" for Hoosier State?
« Reply #13 on: September 20, 2013, 10:58:17 PM »
The last two non-standard Amtrak moves used the symbols P935 and P939.
Prairie Maverick.

indio317

  • Brakeman
  • *
  • Posts: 19
Re: "Skin in the game" for Hoosier State?
« Reply #14 on: September 21, 2013, 12:36:22 PM »
There's a well-written book, "Amtrak in the Heartland", that has quite a bit of detail on the history of the Hoosier State, and the reasons why it was established (one was to not pay Conrail to shuttle trains, as mentioned already).  It is probably no secret to any of us why the Hoosier State didn't get to keep the initial success it enjoyed in the mid-late 80s....lousy scheduling (Indy departure times changed wildly in the 90s...departures as early as 3:50am for a couple of years), frequent delays south of Chicago (although, I did notice it has improved somewhat over the past few months...only to be negated by what seems like more frequent delays between REN-LAF and CRF-IND, lately).   On top of that, longer trip times than 20 years ago, no food service, inconvenient departure/arrival times, and lack of frequency typically seen on corridor routes invariably will make it a less-attractive travel option.   If Amtrak had more frequent trains, an additional stop in the west suburbs of Indy (a station in Brownsburg was proposed once, but never built) for westsiders, a better, cleaner terminal in Indianapolis...the list goes on.  Don't get me wrong, I am a huge Amtrak supporter...if done right, it can be a viable transportation option..but it amazes me somewhat that, as it stands today, that it has lasted this long, given the long laundry list of things going against it.  That said, I will continue, and still ride the Hoosier State/Cardinal between CRF and Chicago, for as long as it's around.

Oh...I agree with CSXCO...the front-page story in the Indianapolis Star seemed like nothing more than fear mongering..it's not like the tracks will be ripped up, once the Hoosier State stops running.

ScottFlood

  • Chief Dispatcher
  • *****
  • Posts: 531
Re: "Skin in the game" for Hoosier State?
« Reply #15 on: September 24, 2013, 06:17:34 PM »
And now INDOT seems to be working on a plan that's contingent upon local financial participation ...

http://www.indystar.com/article/20130924/LOCAL18/309240054/State-hashing-out-plan-save-daily-Amtrak-trains-from-Indianapolis-Chicago

The article refers to the Hoosier State as a "commuter" train, so you have to wonder how much of the rest is accurate ...

doublestacks

  • Mogul
  • *****
  • Posts: 2126
Re: "Skin in the game" for Hoosier State?
« Reply #16 on: September 24, 2013, 07:03:08 PM »
September 26th at 4pm is going to be a rally at the statehouse to save the hoosier state.

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=617808234937148&set=a.166556843395625.45145.165733830144593&type=1&theater
Steel is real and it feels no pain.

Peoria Man

  • Conductor
  • ****
  • Posts: 159
Re: "Skin in the game" for Hoosier State?
« Reply #17 on: September 25, 2013, 04:53:34 PM »
If Amtrak had more frequent trains, an additional stop in the west suburbs of Indy (a station in Brownsburg was proposed once, but never built) for westsiders, a better, cleaner terminal in Indianapolis...the list goes on.

Hard to predict.

I rode one of the "Capitol Corridor" trains in California over the holiday weekend.  Oakland-San Jose.  I was one of just four passengers on board.  But that's in car-crazy California....

ScottFlood

  • Chief Dispatcher
  • *****
  • Posts: 531
Re: "Skin in the game" for Hoosier State?
« Reply #18 on: September 27, 2013, 06:44:08 AM »
And now the state is advocating increased train frequency as a way to reduce the subsidy ...

http://www.indystar.com/article/20130926/LOCAL18/309260081/Improving-Amtrak-service-would-lower-state-subsidy-INDOT-study-finds

CSX_CO

  • Tycoon
  • ******
  • Posts: 8236
  • Ok...lets get our stories straight......
Re: "Skin in the game" for Hoosier State?
« Reply #19 on: September 27, 2013, 01:43:18 PM »
And now the state is advocating increased train frequency as a way to reduce the subsidy ...

I'd be curious to see the numbers behind THAT one?  How is it you run two trains for the price of one?  With the schedule they propose, you're going to need two trainsets, two crews, etc.  No change in the subsidy.  Yet, when they want to run 3 trains, the subsidy 'doubles' to almost $7 million?


From the linked article:
"Amtrak’s current single-train service departs Indianapolis at 6 a.m. and leaves Chicago at 5:45 p.m. It draws about 37,000 riders a year and needs a state subsidy of about $2.9 million, the study found.

Adding a second daily train departing Indianapolis at 8 a.m. and leaving Chicago at 5:30 p.m., according to the study, would boost ridership to 88,000 and lower the subsidy to $2.8 million a year.

Another option, adding a second daily train leaving Indianapolis at 8 a.m. and leaving Chicago at 3:30 p.m., would boost ridership to 86,000 a year, the study found. The subsidy would stay at about $2.9 million a year."

That really confuses me...they repeat themselves, and yet the numbers don't match up...