Author Topic: ITM / Fishers in a dispute  (Read 135833 times)


  • Chief Dispatcher
  • *****
  • Posts: 514
Re: ITM / Fishers in a dispute
« Reply #1720 on: December 07, 2018, 07:05:30 AM »
But it doesn't stop people from filing the suits to intimidate others or gain publicity ... or naming multiple parties in a suit even if the attorney knows the judge is likely to dismiss it or carve some of those parties out. Just makes a lot of noise and wastes time and money.

As a longtime elected official, one gets accustomed to being sued. When people threaten me with a suit, my standard response is along the lines of "Okay, thanks for letting me know."

CIND 2254

  • Global Moderator
  • President
  • *****
  • Posts: 1675
  • Modeling high Hood GP30s on the CERA ca. 1996-1998
Re: ITM / Fishers in a dispute
« Reply #1721 on: December 08, 2018, 10:50:13 AM »
The Fishers segment would be 5.7 miles, from 96th Street (the Marion County - Hamilton County line) north to 146th Street (the border between Fishers and Noblesville).
106th to 126th is estimated to cost about that $9mil mark, i think Fadness wants a bond for $12 mil to pay for that first leg.
Modeling High Hood GP30s on the CERA based in Kokomo circa. 1996-1998.